Advertisement

Examining Individual Differences in the Within-Person Process of Perceived Stress and Cognitive Functioning to Advance Precision Health: Commentary on “Sex Differences in the Relationship between Perceived Stress and Cognitive Trajectories” by Paolillo et al.

Published:January 28, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2023.01.018
      The Paolillo et al.
      • Paolillo EW
      • You M
      • Gontrum E
      • et al.
      Sex differences in the relationship between perceived stress and cognitive trajectories.
      paper added new findings to the evidence on the longitudinal relationship between sex, perceived stress, inflammation, and cognition among a sample of community-dwelling older adults. In their paper, the authors found a significant interaction between mean perceived stress, sex, and time on executive function (but not in memory or processing speed), such that higher mean perceived stress scores were associated with steeper declines in executive functioning over time in men but not in women. In a subset of the sample who had at inflammatory biomarker data at 2 or more timepoints, there was a significant interaction such that higher mean perceived stress scores were associated with greater increases in IL-6 over time in men but not in women, suggesting resilience to executive dysfunction as a consequence of stress induced inflammation.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Paolillo EW
        • You M
        • Gontrum E
        • et al.
        Sex differences in the relationship between perceived stress and cognitive trajectories.
        Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2023; (In press)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2022.11.009
        • Melief J
        • Huitinga I
        • Gold SM.
        The stress-axis in multiple sclerosis: clinical, cellular, and molecular aspects.
        Handb Clin Neurol. 2021; 181: 119-126https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-820683-6.00008-7
        • Moazzami K
        • Garcia M
        • Young A
        • et al.
        Association between symptoms of psychological distress and cognitive functioning among adults with coronary artery disease.
        Stress Health. 2021; 37: 538-546https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3018
        • Henneghan A.
        Modifiable factors and cognitive dysfunction in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-method systematic review.
        Support Care Cancer. 2016; 24: 481-497https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2927-y
        • Yang Y
        • Hendrix CC.
        Cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer patients: influences of psychological variables.
        Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2018; 5: 296-306https://doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_16_18
        • Romero-Martínez Á
        • Hidalgo-Moreno G
        • Moya-Albiol L.
        Neuropsychological consequences of chronic stress: the case of informal caregivers.
        Aging Ment Health. 2020; 24: 259-271https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2018.1537360
        • Corrêa MS
        • de Lima DB
        • Giacobbo BL
        • et al.
        Mental health in familial caregivers of Alzheimer's disease patients: are the effects of chronic stress on cognition inevitable?.
        Stress. 2019; 22: 83-92https://doi.org/10.1080/10253890.2018.1510485
        • Corrêa MS
        • Vedovelli K
        • Giacobbo BL
        • et al.
        Psychophysiological correlates of cognitive deficits in family caregivers of patients with Alzheimer disease.
        Neuroscience. 2015; 286: 371-382https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.11.052
        • Salthouse T
        • Berish D.
        Correlates of within-person (across occasion) variability in reaction time.
        Neuropsychology. 2005; 19: 77-87
        • MacDonald SW
        • Li SC
        • Bäckman L.
        Neural underpinnings of within-person variability in cognitive functioning.
        Psychol Aging. 2009; 24: 792-808https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017798
        • MacDonald SW
        • Nyberg L
        • Bäckman L.
        Intra-individual variability in behavior: links to brain structure, neurotransmission and neuronal activity.
        Trends Neurosci. 2006; 29: 474-480https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2006.06.011
        • Haynes BI
        • Bauermeister S
        • Bunce D.
        Does within-person variability predict errors in healthy adults aged 18-90?.
        Q J Exp Psychol. 2017; 70: 1722-1731https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1204328
        • Sliwinski MJ
        • Smyth JM
        • Hofer SM
        • et al.
        Intraindividual coupling of daily stress and cognition.
        Psychol Aging. 2006; 21: 545-557https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.545
        • Hyun J
        • Sliwinski MJ
        • Smyth JM.
        Waking up on the wrong side of the bed: the effects of stress anticipation on working memory in daily life.
        J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019; 74: 38-46https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby042
        • Neupert SD
        • Neubauer AB
        • Scott SB
        • et al.
        Back to the future: examining age differences in processes before stressor exposure.
        J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019; 74: 1-6https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby074
        • Almeida DM.
        Resilience and vulnerability to daily stressors assessed via diary methods.
        Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2005; 14: 64-68https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00336.x
        • De Calheiros Velozo J
        • Lafit G
        • Viechtbauer W
        • et al.
        Delayed affective recovery to daily-life stressors signals a risk for depression.
        J Affect Disord. 2023; 320: 499-506https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.136
        • Scott SB
        • Ram N
        • Smyth JM
        • et al.
        Age differences in negative emotional responses to daily stressors depend on time since event.
        Dev Psychol. 2017; 53: 177-190https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000257
        • Joshi RS
        • Vigoureux TFD
        • Lee S.
        Daily association of stressors with perceived cognitive performance: moderating role of age.
        Stress Health. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3195
        • Lazarides C
        • Ward EB
        • Buss C
        • et al.
        Psychological stress and cortisol during pregnancy: an ecological momentary assessment (EMA)-based within- and between-person analysis.
        Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2020; 121104848https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.104848
        • Weber J
        • Angerer P
        • Apolinário-Hagen J.
        Physiological reactions to acute stressors and subjective stress during daily life: a systematic review on ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies.
        PloS one. 2022; 17e0271996https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271996

      Linked Article

      • Sex Differences in the Relationship between Perceived Stress and Cognitive Trajectories
        The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
        • Preview
          Chronic stress adversely affects cognition, in part due to stress-induced inflammation. Rodent models suggest females are more resilient against stress-related cognitive dysfunction than males; however, few studies have examined this in humans. We examined sex differences in the relationship between perceived stress, cognitive functioning, and peripheral inflammation over time among cognitively normal older adults.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF
        Open Access