- •What is the primary question addressed by this study? This study addressed the question of whether computerized functional skills training improved cognition in older people with normal cognition or cognitive impairments.
- •What is the main finding of this study? Computerized functional skills training alone was associated with improvements in four of six cognitive domains assessed in participants with cognitive impairments. Overall, combined computerized cognitive and functional skills training led to greater improvements in all six domains of cognition across the two participant groups.
- •What is the meaning of the finding? These data suggest that both older people with cognitive impairments and normal cognition show evidence of plasticity in their cognitive functioning and that combining functional skills and cognitive training leads to wide-ranging cognitive improvements.
Both cognitively impaired (CI) and nonimpaired (NC) older people have challenges in performing everyday tasks. Previous skills training efforts in NC individuals have led to improvements in both functional skills and cognitive functioning. We evaluated the cognitive benefits of combining computerized cognitive training (CCT) with a computer-based functional skills assessment and training (CFSAT) program in a sample of CI and NC older adults.
Randomized parallel clinical trial with two treatment conditions: up to 24 sessions of CFSAT training alone or CFSAT plus speed focused CCT.
NC (n = 62) and CI (n = 55) older adults, ranging in age from 60–86 years (M = 73.12), primarily female (90%), and ethnically diverse (21% Hispanic, 52% African American). Participants were divided based on Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores and cognitive complaints.
Three different community centers in Miami, FL.
The Brief Assessment of Cognition, app version, was used to measure cognitive performance across six different cognitive domains before and after training.
All six cognitive domains improved from baseline. Multivariate analyses found the effects of the combined CFSAT and CCT to be superior. The interaction of training condition and cognitive status was not statistically significant, indicating no global impact of cognitive status on improvements in cognition across training conditions.
CFSAT training was associated with cognitive benefits, particularly in CI participants. The combined intervention led to greater improvements. Consistent with results of previous studies, there is considerable evidence of cognitive plasticity in older adults, including those with CI.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Alzheimer disease in the United States (2010-2050) estimated using the 2010 census.Neurology. 2013; 80: 1778-1783https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828726f5
- Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome.Arch Neurol. 1999; 56: 303-308https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.56.3.303
- The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimers Dement. 2011; 7: 270-279https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008
- Mild cognitive impairment–beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on mild cognitive impairment.J Intern Med. 2004; 256: 240-246https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01380.x
- Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment.Arch Neurol. 2001; 58: 1985-1992https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.58.12.1985
- Performance-based measures of everyday function in mild cognitive impairment.Am J Psychiatry. 2010; 167: 845-853https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09050692
- Development and cross-validation of the UPSA short form for the performance-based functional assessment of patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease.Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011; 19: 915-922https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e3182011846
- Development of an UPSA short form for use in longitudinal studies in the early Alzheimer's disease spectrum.J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2020; 7: 179-183https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2019.5
- Assessment of age-related differences in functional capacity using the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT).J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2015; 2: 121-127https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2015.61
- Assessment of instrumental activities of daily living in older adults with subjective cognitive decline using the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT).J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2018; 5: 216-234https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2018.28
- A novel method for direct assessment of everyday competence among older adults.J Alzheimers Dis. 2017; 57: 1229-1238https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-161183
- Helping older individuals overcome the challenges of technology.Curr Psychiatry. 2020; 19: 13-23
- Effects of computerised cognitive training on cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis [published online ahead of print, 2019 Oct 24].J Neurol. 2019; (10.1007/s00415-019-09522-7)https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09522-7
- Effect of computerised cognitive training on cognitive outcomes in mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2019; 9 (Published 2019 Aug 18)e027062https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027062
- The efficacy of cognitive intervention in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): a meta-analysis of outcomes on neuropsychological Measures.Neuropsychol Rev. 2017; 27: 440-484https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-017-9363-3
- Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial.J Am Med Assoc. 2002; 288: 2271-2281
- Cognitive speed of processing training delays driving cessation.J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009; 64: 1262-1267
- Ten-year effects of the advanced cognitive training for independent and vital elderly cognitive training trial on cognition and everyday functioning in older adults.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014; 62: 16-24
- Speed of processing training results in lower risk of dementia.Alzheimers Dement Transl Res Clin Interv. 2017; 3: 603-611
- The effect of cognitive speed of processing training on the development of additional IADL difficulties and the reduction of depressive symptoms results from the IHAMS randomized controlled trial.J Aging Health. 2015; 27: 334-354
- Improvement in Memory with Plasticity-based Adaptive Cognitive Training (IMPACT): results of the 3-month follow-up.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011; 59: 258-265
- The transfer of cognitive speed of processing training to older adults’ driving mobility across 5 years.J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2015; 71: 87-97
- Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults.JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2006; 296: 2805-2814
- Neuroscience-informed auditory training in schizophrenia: a final report of the effects on cognition and serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor.Schizophr Res Cogn. 2016; 3: 1-7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2015.10.006
- Cognitive enhancement treatment for people with mental illness who do not respond to supported employment: a randomized controlled trial.Am J Psychiatry. 2015; 172: 852-861
- Evaluation of a novel technology-based program designed to assess and train everyday skills in older adults.Innov Aging. 2020; 4 (Published 2020 Dec 9): igaa052https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa052
- Training older adults to use tablet computers: does it enhance cognitive function?.Gerontologist. 2016; 56: 475-484https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu057
- The impact of sustained engagement on cognitive function in older adults: the Synapse Project.Psychol Sci. 2014; 25: 103-112https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613499592
- The impact of learning multiple real-world skills on cognitive abilities and functional independence in healthy older adults.J Gerontol B: Psychol Sci. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbz084
- The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005; 53: 695-699https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
- Detection of mild cognitive impairment among community-dwelling African Americans using the montreal cognitive assessment.Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2019; 34: 809-813https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acy091
- The brief assessment of cognition in schizophrenia: reliability, sensitivity, and comparison with a standard neurocognitive battery.Schizophr Res. 2004; 68: 283-297
- Norms and standardization of the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS).Schizophr Res. 2008; 102: 108-115
- Validation of the tablet-administered Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC App).Schizophr Res. 2017; 181: 100-106
IBM Corporation. SPSS Version 28, Armonk, NY 2021
- Practice effects due to serial cognitive assessment: implications for preclinical Alzheimer's disease randomized controlled trials.Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2015; 1 (Published 2015): 103-111https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2014.11.003
- The computerized functional skills assessment and training program: sensitivity to global cognitive impairment, correlations with cognitive abilities, and factor structure [published online ahead of print, 2020 Sep 7].Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020; (S1064-7481(20)30470-X)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2020.08.019
- Does social cognition training augment response to computer-assisted cognitive remediation for schizophrenia?.Schizophr Res. 2018; 201: 180-186https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.012
- Combined cognitive remediation and functional skills training for schizophrenia: effects on cognition, functional competence, and real-world behavior.Am J Psychiatry. 2012; 169: 710-718
Published online: November 21, 2021
Accepted: November 16, 2021
Received in revised form: November 13, 2021
Received: October 19, 2021
© 2021 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.